The Decline of the Hegemonic Power of the United States and the Emergence of Multipolarism: Challenges for Latin America
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper exposes the debate about the decline of the hegemonic power of the United States in the world order, associated with the emergence of a new multipolar order. It is related to the debate on the validity of the North-South division after the end of the Cold War, to make a reflection concerning the complexities that Latin America could face, in a new multipolar order. The methodology is the historical analysis based on a review of primary and secondary sources. The stages of a debate that began in the eighties of the last century and that continues to the present are diachronically exposed. It concludes that regional unity is important to face the challenges of the emerging new world order
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Urvio, Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad, operates under Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Work 3.0 unported (CC BY-ND 3.0).
The authors who publish in Urvio accept these terms:
You are free to share / copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, including commercial. Therefore, authors retain the copyright and cede to the journal the right of the first publication (CC by-ND 3.0), which allows third parties the redistribution, commercial or noncommercial, of what is published as long as the article circulates without changes.
The following conditions exist for the authors:
Recognition - you must recognize the authorship, provide a link to the license and indicate whether changes have been made. You can do this in any way reasonable, but not in a way that suggest that has the support of the licensor or receives it by the use he makes.
Without Derivative Work – If you remixed, transform or create a work from the original material, you cannot broadcast the modified material.
For more details, visit the page of Creative Commons (CC).
References
Acharya, Amitav. 2014. The End of American Worl Order. Malden: Pólity Press.
Acharya, Amitav. 2017. “After Liberal Hegemony: The Advent of a Multiplex World Order”. Ethics & International Affairs 31(3): 271-285.
Asian Development Bank.2011. “Asia 2050: Realizing the Asian Century”, https://bit.ly/3Q7MQBq
Babic, Milan. 2020. “Let’s talk about the interregnum:Gramsci and the crisis of the liberal world order”. International Affairs 96 (3): 767-786.
Banco Mundial. 2021a. “PIB (US$ a precios actuales). Datos sobre las cuentas nacionales del Banco Mundial y archivos de datos sobre cuentas nacionales de la OCDE”, https://datos.bancomundial.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD
Banco Mundial. 2021b. “4.2. World Development Indicators: Structure of value added”, http://wdi.worldbank.org/table/4.2
Baroud, Ramzy, y Romana Rubeo. 2022. “Más allá del «interregno»: ¿Es posible un mundo no hegemónico?”. Metapolis 13: 17-25.
Barma, Naazneen, Giacomo Chiozza, Ely Ratner y Steven Weber. 2009. “A World Without the West? Empirical Patterns and Theoretical Implications”. Chinese Journal of International Politics 2 (4): 525–54
Brzezinski, Zbigniew. 2013. Strategic Vision. American and the crisis of the global power. Nueva York: Basic Book.
Buzan, Barry. 1991. “New Patterns of Global Security in the Twenty-First Century”. International Affairs 67 (3): 431-451.
Cabello, Alejandra; Ortiz, Edgar; Sosa, Miriam. 2021. “Creciente importancia de los BRICS en la gobernanza financiera y economía globales”. Oikos Polis 6 (1): 135-184.
Calle, Fabian, y DerGhoukassian, Khatchik.2003. “El guardián del mundo unipolar y sus críticos. la estrategia de Seguridad Nacional de Estados Unidos y la construcción del espacio alternativo”. Colección 14: 65-97
Comisión Brandt. 1981. Diálogo Norte-Sur. Informe de la Comisión Brandt. México DF: Nueva Sociedad.
Dabat, Alejandro; Leal, Paulo. 2019. “Ascenso y declive de Estados Unidos en la hegemonía mundial”. Problemas del Desarrollo. Revista Latinoamericana de Economía 50 (199): 87-114.
Del Prado, Josefina. 1998. “La división norte-sur en las relaciones internacionales”. Agenda Internacional 5 (8): 23-34.
Falconí, Fander. 2014. Al Sur de las Decisiones. Quito: El Conejo
Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. Nueva York: Free Press.
Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grey, Kevin, y Murphy, Craig. 2013. “Introduction: rising powers and the future of global governance”. Third World Quarterly 34 (2): 183-193
Haass, Richard N. 2008. “The Age of Nonpolarity: What Will Follow U.S. Dominance”. Foreign Affairs 87 (3): 44-56.
Herrera Santana, David. 2017. “Hegemonía y Relaciones Internacionales. Un estado del arte”. Revista de Relaciones Internacionales de la UNAM 127: 11-47.
Ikenberry, John G. 2018. “The end of liberal international order?”. International Affairs 94 (1): 7–23
Informe de la Comisión Brandt. 1981. Diálogo Norte-Sur. México D.F: Nueva Sociedad
López Villafañe, Víctor. 2005. “El mundo unipolar y las contradicciones y límites de la globalización”. CONfines 1: 31-49.
Massie, Justin, y Jonathan Paquin. 2020.; America’s Allies and the Decline of U.S. Hegemony. Nueva York: Routledge.
Morales Ruvalcaba, Daniel. 2018. “Interregno hegemónico y competencia interestatal. Perspectivas para el siglo XXI”. Foreing Affairs Latinoamerica, 5 de marzo. https://bit.ly/48Oo5B
Møller Stahl, Rune. 2019. “Ruling the Interregnum: Politics and Ideology in Nonhegemonic Times”. Politics & Society 47(3): 333-360
Nye, Joseph S. 2010. “The Future of American Power: Dominance and Decline in Perspective”. Foreign Affairs 89 (6): 2-12.
Jensana Tanehashi, Amadeo. 2020. El Banco Asiático de Inversión en Infraestructura. La participación de Europa y de España. Madrid: CEU ediciones.
Johnson, Chalmers.1989. “The End of American Hegemony and the Future of US-Japan Relation”. Harvard International Review 11 (3): 126-131
Kennedy, Paul. 1988. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. Economic change and military conflicts from 1500 to 2000. Londres: Unwin Hyman.
Kissinger, Henry. 2017. La diplomacia. México DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Kern, Alejandra E., y Lara Weisstaub. 2011. “El debate sobre la Cooperación Sur-Sur y su lugar en la política exterior de la Argentina”. Revista Española de Desarrollo y Cooperación 27: 83-95.
Krauthammer, Charles. 1990. “The Unipolar Moment”. Foreign Affairs 70 (1): 23-33.
Layne, Christopher.1993. “The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise”. International Security 17 (4): 5-51
Layne, Christopher. 2012. “This Time It's Real: The End of Unipolarity and the Pax Americana”. International Studies Quarterly 56: 203-213
Lieber, Robert J. 2020. “American Decline. Destined, chosen or contingent?”. En America’s Allies and the Decline of U.S. Hegemony, editado por Justin Massie y Jonathan Paquin, 39-62. Nueva York: Routledge.
Palou, Jordi. 1993. “El concepto de potencia media. Los casos de España y México”. Revista Cidob d’Afers Internacionals 26: 7-35
Pelfini, Alejandro; Fulquet, Gastón; Bidaseca, Karina. 2015. “Introducción. Los BRICS en el orden global: ¿construyendo nuevos cimientos o negociando con las estructuras existentes?”. En Los BRICS en la reforma de la multipolaridad: ¿reforma o adaptación?, coordinado por Alejandro Pelfini y Gastón Fulquet, 8-18. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
Puig, Laura. 2023. “La ampliación de los BRICS: ¿un paso hacia el multilateralismo o un desafío a Occidente?”. El Periódico, 24 de agosto. https://bit.ly/3PLzfyh
Savio, Roberto. 2021. “De Bandung al No Alineamiento Activo: historia y lecciones”. En El No Alineamiento Activo y América Latina: Una doctrina para el nuevo siglo, editado por Jorge Heine y Carlos Ominami, 168-170. Santiago: Catalonia.
Sanahuja, José Antonio. 2022. “Interregno. La actualidad de un orden mundial en crisis”. Nueva Sociedad 302: 86-94.
Schweller, Randall L., y Xiaoyu Pu. 2011. “After Unipolarity. China's Visions of International Order in an Era of U.S. Decline”. International Security 36 (1): 41-72.
Serfaty, Simon. 2011. “Moving into a Post-Western World”. The Washington Quarterly 34 (2): 7-23.
Stephen, Matthew D. 2017. “Emerging Powers and Emerging Trends in Global Governance”. Global Governance 23 (3): 483-502.
Stuenkel, Oliver. 2020. “Emerging Powers and BRICS”, https://bit.ly/3tq79B4
Tellis, Ashley J. 2010. “Strategic Asia: Continuing Success with Continuing Risks”. En Strategic Asia 2010–11: Asia’s Rising Power and America’s Continued Purpose, editado por Ashley Tellis, Andrew Marble y Treavis Tanner, 3-22. Washington DC: The National Bureau of Asian Research. https://bit.ly/3RYYyPU
Therien, Jean-Philippe. 1999. “Beyond the North-South divide: The two tales of world poverty”. Third World Quarterly 20 (4): 723-742.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1993. “The Emerging Structure of International Politics”. International Security 18 (2): 44-79.
Nehru, Vikram. 2014. “The BRICS Bank: now comes to hard part”. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 17 de julio. https://bit.ly/3tmhaiJ
Yendamuri, Praneeth, y Zara Ingilizian. 2020. “En 2020, Asia registrará el mayor PIB mundial. ¿Qué significa eso?”. World Economic Forum, Davos, 9 de enero. https://bit.ly/3tqlgqa
Zakaria, Fareed. 2008. The Post-American World. New York/Londres: W. W. Norton & Company.
Zakaria, Fareed. 2011. The Post Amercian World. Release 2.0. Nueva York/Londres: W. W. Norton & Company.