Mechanisms for the comprehension of collective actions that seek to obtain an agroecological transition
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aims to propose practical and theoretical mechanisms for the understanding of collective actions, the purpose of which is to accomplish an agroecological transition. The theoretical framework is based on the main theories of collective action and social mobilization in the context of the Western world. The proposal materializes in guidelines that serve as answers to the following questions: what kind of society engages in collective action and what does agroecology mean? What motivations are there that can be used to participate in the agroecological transition and in the collective action that promotes it? What are the strategies for achieving the agroecological transition? And what is the political context and how does it affect collective action and the agroecological transition of the territory? The answers to these questions allow the analysis of the disposition of the actors to exchange traditional productive practices for agro-ecological ones, and also to examine the capacity for change and social transformation which collective action has in a given territory.
Downloads
Article Details
Letras Verdes, Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Socioambientales, operates under Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Work 3.0 unported (CC BY-ND 3.0).
The authors who publish in Letras Verdes accept these terms:
You are free to share / copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, including commercial. Therefore, authors retain the copyright and cede to the journal the right of the first publication (CC by-ND 3.0), which allows third parties the redistribution, commercial or noncommercial, of what is published as long as the article circulates without changes.
The following conditions exist for the authors:
Recognition - you must recognize the authorship, provide a link to the license and indicate whether changes have been made. You can do this in any way reasonable, but not in a way that suggest that has the support of the licensor or receives it by the use he makes.
Without Derivative Work – If you remixed, transform or create a work from the original material, you cannot broadcast the modified material.
For more details, visit the page of Creative Commons (CC).
References
Altieri, Miguel & Nicholls, Clara. (2000). Teoría y práctica para una agricultura sutentable. México: Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente.
Archila, Miguel. (1998). Actores sociales y democracia en Colombia. Credencia Historia, Vol. 107.
Berrío, Ayder. (2006). la perspectiva de los nuevos movimientos sociales en las obras de Sydney Tarrow, Alain touraine y Alberto Melucci. Estudios políticos, Vol, 29, pp. 219-236.
Bottino, María; Demmel, María & Guardiola, Emiliano. (2009). Mancur Lloyd Olson: un científico social. Actualidad Económica, Vol 69, pp. 21-32.
Chihu, Aquiles. (2000). Melucci: la teoría de la acción colectiva. Argumentos, Vol, 27, pp. 79-92.
Cohen, Jean. (1985). Strategy or identity: new theoretical paradignms and contemporary social movements. Social Research Vol. 52, No.4, pp. 663-716.
Costabeber, José. (1998). Acción colectiva y transición agroecológica en Río Grande do Sul, Brasil. Tesis presentada para optar por el título de doctor. Programa de Dosctorado en Agreoclogía, Campesinado e Historia. Universidad de Córdoba.
Dagnino, Evelina; Olvera, Alberto & Panfichi, Aldo. (2007). Innovación democrática en América Latina: una primera mirada al proyecto democrático-participativo. En E. Dagnino,
A. Olvera, & A. Panfichi, Innovación democrática en el sus (pp. 31-58). San José, Costa Rica.
Dalggard, Tommy; Hutchings, Nicholas & Porter, Jhon. (2003). Agroecology, scaling and interdisciplinary. Agriculture, Ecosystems and environment, Vol. 100, pp. 39-51.
Diani, Mario. (2002). Network analysis. En B. Klandermans, & S. Staggenborg, Method of social movement research (pp. 173-200). Minesotta: The University Minesotta Press.
Escobar, Arturo & Álvarez, Sonia. (1992). The making of social movement in Latin America; identity, strategy and democracy. San francisco: Westview Press.
Escobar, Arturo; Álvarez, Sonia & Dagnino, Evelina (. (2001). Política cultural y cultura política, una nueva mirada sobre movimientos sociales latiniamericanos. Bogotá: Tauros- ICANH.
Flam, Helena. (2005). Emotion´s map. A research agenda. En H. Flam, & D. King, Emotions and social movements (pp. 19-40). Abingdon: Routledge.
Flam, Helena, & King, Debra. (2005). Introduction. En Emotions and Social Movements (pp. 1-18). Abingdon: Routledge.
Gamson, William. (1992). The social psychology of collective action. En A. Morris, & M. Mac Clurg , Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 53-74). New Haven & Londres: Yale University Press.
Gliessman, Stephen. (2013). Agroecología: plantando las raíces de la resistencia. Agroecología Vol. 8, No. 2, pp.19-26.
González, Eduardo. (2002). La violencia en la política: perspectivas teóricas sobre el empleo de la fuerza en los conflictos políticos. Madrid: CSIC.
Jasper, James. (2006). Motivation and emotion. En R. Goodin, & C. Tilly, Oxford hanbook of contextual political studies (pp. 157-171). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jasper, James. (2012). ¿De la estructura a la acción? La teoría de los movimientos sociales después de los grandes paradigmas. Sociología Vol, 27, No 75, pp. 7-48.
Keck, Margaret., & Sikkink, Kathryn. (2000). Activistas sin fronteras: redes de defensa en lapolítica internacional. México: Siglo XXI.
Klandermans, Bert. (1997). The Social Psychology of Protest. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Le Bon, Gustav. (1983). [1875] Psicología de las multitudes. Madrid: Morata.
Mac Clurg, Carol. (1992). Building social movement theory . En A. Morris, & C. Mac Clurg, Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 3-25). New Haven & Londres: Yale University Press.
Mannheim, Karl. (1993). Ideología y Utopía (Echavarría, Trad.). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica (Trabajo original publicado en 1936).
Massal, Julie. (2014). Revuletas, insurreciones y protestas. Un panorama de las dinámicas de movilización en el siglo XXI. Bogotá: IEPRI Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
McCarthy, Jhon & Zald, Mayer. (1977). Resources movilization and Social Movements: A Partial theory. The American journal of Sociology, Vol. 82, No. 6, pp. 1212-1241.
Melucci, Alberto. (1980). The new social movements: a theorical approach. Social Science Information Vol. 10, No.2
Melucci, Alberto. (1988). Getting involved, identity and mobilization in social movements. En B. Klandermans, & H. Kriesi, From structure to action, comparing social movements across cultures. Greenwich: J.A.I. Press.
Melucci, Alberto. (1999). Acción colectiva, vida cotidiana y democriacia. México: El Colegio de México.
Munck, Gerardo. (1995). Algunos problemas conceptuales en el estudio de los movimietnos sociales. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 17-40.
Neveu, Eric. (2000). Sociología de los movimientos soicales. Quito: Ediciones ABYA.YALA.
Nogué, Joan. (1988). El fenómeno neorrural. Agricultura y Sociedad, Vol. 47, pp. 145-175.
Obershall, Anthony. (1973). Social conflicts and social movements. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Olson, Mancur. (2002). [1965] The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ostrom, Elinor, Ahn, T., & Olivares, Cecilia. (2003). Una perspectiva del capital social desde las ciencias sociales: capital social y acción colectiva. Revista Mexicana de Sociología 65(1), Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 155-233.
Parrado, Álvaro. (2010). De las empresas asociativas a los núcleos de emprendedores rurales. Agnonomía Colombiana, Vol. 28, No. 3.
Putnam, Robert. (1995). Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 65–78.
Rosset, Peter, & Martínez-Torres, María. (2012). Rural social movements and agroecology: context, theory, and process. Ecology and Society, Vol. 17, No. 3.
Sarandón, Santiago, & Flores, Claudia. (2014). Agroecología: bases teóricas para el diseño y manejo de agroecosistemas sustentables. La Plata: Universdiad de la Plata.
Slater, David. (1985). New Social Movements and the State in Latin America. Amsterdam: CEDLA.
Snow, David & Benford, Robert. (1992). Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization. En B. Klandermans,
K. Hanspeter , & S. Tarrow, From Structure to Action: Social Movement Participation Across Cultures (pp. 197-217). Greenwich : JAI Press.
Tarrés, María. (1992). Perspectivas analíticas de la Sociología de la acción colectiva. Estudios Sociológicos, Vol. 10, No.3, pp.735-757.
Tarrow, Sideny. (2004). El poder en movimiento. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Tilly, Charles. (2000). Acción colectiva. Apuntes de Investigación del CECYP, Vol.4, No.6
Touraine, Alain. (1988). The return of the actor. Minneaopolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Touraine, Alain. (2006). Los movimientos sociales. Revista Colombiana de la Sociología, Vol. 27, pp. 255-278.
Vernis, Alfred; Iglesias, María; Sanz, Beatriz; Solernou, María;
Urgell Jaume, & Vidal, Pau. (2004). La gestión de las organizaciones no lucrativas. Barcelona: Ediociones Deusto.
Wezel, Alexander & Jauneau, Jean. (2011). Agroecology- Interpretations, approaches and their links to nature conservation, rural development and ecoturism. En W. B. Campbell, & S. López Ortiz, Intagrating agriculture, conservation and ecoturism: examples from field, issues in agroecology. Springer Science+ Business Media.
Wezel, A., & Soldat, Virginie. (2009). A quantitative and quialitative historical analysis od the scientific discipline of agroecology. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability Vol. 7, No.1, pp. 3-18.