Tecnología como proyecto territorial de conquista y espacio como producción política
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article analyses the territorial logic embodied in technology to understand the implications of its production, use and expansion for the practice of an other conviviality and sustainable forms of life. Bridging political economy, political philosophy, postcolonial critique and critical approaches to technology and environment, the article questions anthropocentric, theological and economic assumptions at the basis of technological construction. Drawing on the notions of space as produced by political action and conquest as structure and organising principle, it is argued that technology presents itself as exacerbation and mobilisation of a territorial project of conquest, unfinished but constant and expansive, which ignores and destroys the sustaining conditions of a shared existence.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Eutopía, Revista de Desarrollo Económico Territorial, operates under Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Work 3.0 unported (CC BY-ND 3.0).
The authors who publish in Eutopía accept these terms:
You are free to share / copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, including commercial. Therefore, authors retain the copyright and cede to the journal the right of the first publication (CC by-ND 3.0), which allows third parties the redistribution, commercial or noncommercial, of what is published as long as the article circulates without changes.
The following conditions exist for the authors:
Recognition - you must recognize the authorship, provide a link to the license and indicate whether changes have been made. You can do this in any way reasonable, but not in a way that suggest that has the support of the licensor or receives it by the use he makes.
Without Derivative Work – If you remixed, transform or create a work from the original material, you cannot broadcast the modified material.
For more details, visit the page of Creative Commons (CC).
References
Acosta, Alberto. 2012. “Extractivismo y neoextractivismo: dos caras de la misma maldición”. Ecoportal. https://www.ecoportal.net/temas-especiales/contaminacion/extractivismo_y_neoextractivismo_dos_caras_de_la_misma_maldicion/
Agamben, Giorgio. 2015. The Use of Bodies, Homo Sacer IV, 2. California: Stanford University Press.
— 2011. The Kingdom and the Glory: For a Theological Genealogy of Economy and Government, Homo Sacer II, 2. California: Stanford UP.
— 2009. What is an Apparatus? And other Essays. California: Stanford UP.
— 1998. El poder soberano y la nuda vida. Homo Sacer I. Valencia: Pre-Textos.
ALBOAN. 2020. Inicio. En Tecnología Libre De Conflicto–Alboan. Recuperado de https://www.tecnologialibredeconflicto.org/
Anón, Valeria y Rufer, Mario. 2018. “Lo colonial como silencio, la conquista como tabu?: reflexiones en tiempo presente”. Tabula Rasa, (29): 107-131. Doi: https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n29.06
Gudynas, Eduardo. 2015. Extractivismos. Ecología, economía y política de un modo de entender el desarrollo y la naturaleza. Bolivia: CLAES-CEDIB.
Haff, Peter. 2014. “Humans and technology in the Anthropocene: Six rules”. The Anthropocene Review 1(2): 126-136. DOI: 10.1177/2053019614530575
Hornborg, Alf. 2019. Nature, Society, and Justice in the Anthropocene. Cambridge University Press.
— 2016. Global Magic. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Latour, Bruno. 2017. Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity.
Machado Aráoz, Horacio. 2013. “Crisis ecológica, conflictos socioambientales y orden neocolonial. Las paradojas de Nuestra América en las fronteras del extractivismo”. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Latino-Americanos 3(1): 118-155. http://rebela.edugraf.ufsc. br/index.php/pc/article/view/137.
Marder, Michael. 2010. Groundless Existence: the political ontology of Carl Schmitt. New York: Continuum.
Moore, Jason. 2018. “The Capitalocene Part II: Accumulation by Appropriation and the Centrality of Unpaid Work/energy”. The Journal of Peasant Studies 45(2): 237-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1272587
— 2017. “Metabolic Rift or Metabolic Shift? Dialectics, Nature, and the World-historical Method”. Theory & Society (46): 285-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-017-9290-6
Moore, Jason. 2015. “Cheap Food and Bad Climate: From Surplus Value to Negative Value in the Capitalist World-Ecology”. Critical Historical Studies 2(1): 1-43.
— 2011. “Transcending the Metabolic Rift: a Theory of Crises in the Capitalist World-Ecology”. Journal of Peasant Studies 38(1): 1-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2 010.538579
Ojakangas, M. 2007. ‘A terrifying world without an exterior: Carl Schmitt and the metaphysics of international (dis)order’. En The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt: Terror, liberal war and the crisis of global order, editado por Louiza Odysseos y Fabio Petito, 205-221. London: Routledge.
Schmitt, Carl. 2003. The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum. New York: Telos.
— 2000. ‘State Ethics and the Pluralist State’. En Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis, editado por A. J. Jacobson y B Schlink, 300-312. Berkeley: University of California Press.
— 1996. The Concept of the Political. London: University of Chicago Press.
— 1993. Verfassungslehre. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot
Stiegler, B. (1998) Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus. California: Stanford University Press.
Svampa, Maristella. 2019. Las fronteras del neoextractivismo en América Latina. México: CALAS-Universidad de Guadalajara.
Wolfe, Patrick. 2008. “Structure and Event: Settler Colonialism, Time and the Question of Genocide”. En Empire, Colony, Genocide: Conquest, Occupation, and Subaltern Resistance in World History, editado por Derek Moses, 102-132. New York: Berghahn Books.