Representaciones de China entre estudiantes chilenos de posgrado en negocios (2018-2022)
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Este artículo explora las formas en las que se representa a China en Chile a través de un caso de estudio: 71 estudiantes de un posgrado en negocios, entre 2018 y 2022. A partir de una adaptación de la metodología DAST, se les pidió a los participantes que dibujaran China, sin más instrucciones, lo que permitió identificar las principales representaciones sobre ese país de estudiantes chilenos de un posgrado en negocios. Los resultados muestran que los estudiantes representan a China desde dimensiones históricas tradicionales. Pese al creciente y más amplio intercambio económico entre ambos países, prevalecen las ideas esencialistas de China como otro, formuladas desde una dimensión de mercado.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Urvio, Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad opera bajo licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-Sin Obra Derivada 3.0 Unported (CC BY-ND 3.0).
Los autores/as que publiquen en Urvio aceptan estos términos:
Usted es libre de compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato para cualquier finalidad, incluso comercial. Por tanto, autores conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación (CC BY-ND 3.0), que permite a terceros la redistribución, comercial o no comercial, de lo publicado siempre y cuando el artículo circule sin cambios.
Existen las siguientes condiciones para los autores:
Reconocimiento — Debe reconocer la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace.
Sin Obra Derivada — Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no puede difundir el material modificado.
Para más detalles, visitar la página de Creative Commons (CC).
Citas
Ahmed, Sara. 2000. Strange Encounters: Embodied Others in Post-Coloniality. Londres: Routledge. bit.ly/422l1hv
Ampuero, Pablo, y Claudia Labarca. 2017. “Chilean business orientalism: The role of non-state actors in the frame of asymmetric bilateral relations”. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering 11(6): 1353-1360. https://bit.ly/3nrgvKa
Ang, Ien. 2020. “Chinatowns and the Rise of China”. Modern Asian Studies 54(4): 1367-1393. doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X19000179
Armony, Ariel, y Nicolás Velásquez. 2015. “Anti-Chinese Sentiment in Latin America: An Analysis of Online Discourse”. Journal of Chinese Political Science 20(3): 319-346. doi.org/10.1007/s11366-015-9365-z
Bisley, Nick. 2018. “Australia’s engagement with China: From fear to greed and back again”. International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis 73(3): 379-398. doi.org/10.1177/0020702018792918
Blázquez-Lidoy, Jorge, Javier Rodríguez y Javier Santiso. 2007. “Angel or Devil? China´s Trade Impact on Latin American Emerging Markets”. En The visible hand of China in Latin America, editado por Javier Santiso, 45-83. París: OCDE.
Borquez, Ana. 2020. “Exploring the Nontraditional Foreign Investment in Sino–Latin American Relations: The Chilean Case”. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries 21(1): 18-33. doi.org/10.1177/1783591719877592
Chambers, David Wade. 1983. “Stereotypic images of the scientists: The draw-a-scientists test”. Science Education 67(2): 255-265.
Chan, Carol. 2020. “Permanent migrants and temporary citizens: multinational Chinese mobilities in the Americas”. Global Networks 21(1): 64-83. doi.org/10.1111/glob.12279
Chan, Carol, y Maria Montt Strabucchi. 2021. “Many-Faced Orientalism: Racism and Xenophobia in a Time of the Novel Coronavirus in Chile”. Asian Ethnicity 22(2): 374-394. doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2020.1795618
Chen, Ming-Jer. 2001. Inside Chinese business: a guide for managers worldwide. Boston: Harvard Business School.
Clissold, Tim. 2004. Mr. China. Milsons Point: Random House Australia.
Creswell, John, y Vicki Plano Clark. 2006. Designing and Conducting Mixed Method Research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
DeHart, Monica. 2021. Transpacific Developments. The Politics of Multiple Chinas in Central Americas. Londres: Cornell University Press.
Fabian, Johannes. 1983. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.
Fang, Tony. 1999. Chinese Business Negotiating Style. Londres: SAGE.
Geertz, Clifford. 1990. La interpretación de las culturas. Madrid: Gedisa.
Gil-Barragan, Juan, Andres Aguilera-Castillo y Llanet Suárez Galeano. 2020. “A Bibliometric Analysis of China–Latin America Economic and Political Relations”. Latin American Policy 11: 290-312. doi.org/10.1111/lamp.12191
González, Fredy. 2017. Paisanos Chinos: Transpacific Politics among Chinese Immigrants in Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Harzing, Anne-Wil y Markus Pudelko. 2016. “Do We Need to Distance Ourselves from the Distance Concept? Why Home and Host Country Context Might Matter More Than (Cultural) Distance”. Management International Review 56(1): 1-34. doi.org/10.1007/s11575-015-0265-4
Huang, Fang, Yanxiang Huang y Zhi Min Chao Wei. 2014. “A study of Chinese College Students’ Images of the Scientist”. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research 1(2): 61-66. https://bit.ly/3kFpDJT
Hubbert, Jennifer. 2019. China In The World: An Anthropology Of Confucius Institutes, Soft Power, And Globalization. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Labarca, Claudia. 2013. “Identity and institutionalisation as trust building strategies: The Sino-Chilean case”. Revista de Ciencia Política 33(2): 489-511. doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2013000200004
Labarca, Claudia. 2015. Ni hao Mr. Pérez. Buenos días Mr. Li: Chile y China: cultura, negocios y confianza en la Era Global. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones UC.
Labarca, Claudia, y Maria Montt Strabucchi. 2019. “Discurso como representación de sentido en las relaciones internacionales: el caso sino-chileno”. Estudios políticos 47: 163-184. doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.24484903e.2019.47.69504
Labarca, Claudia, y Pablo Ampuero. 2021. “Cultural and Global Perspectives to Relationship Management in International Public Relations: The Sino-Chilean Case Study” International Communication Gazette 83(8): 776-798. doi.org/10.1177/1748048520929817
Labarca, Claudia, María Montt Strabucchi y Ingrid Bachmann. 2023. “Nuances of Public Diplomacy: China in Chilean Op-Eds (2018-2021)”. Communication & Society 36(2): 339-353. doi.org/10.15581/003.36.2.339-353
Leavy, Aisling, y Mairead Hourigan. 2021. “‘The green potion is the virus. The blue one is the corona test. The coloured one makes your wish come true’: Irish children’s changing perceptions of a scientist as a result of the onset of COVID-19”. Irish Educational Studies 40(2): 407-418. doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.1915845
Lee, Ching Kwan. 2017. The Specter of Global China: Politics, Labor, and Foreign Investment in Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Luhmann, Niklas. 2017. Trust and Power. Nueva York: John Wiley & Sons.
Manning, Peter, y Betsy Cullum-Swan. 1994. “Narrative, Content, and Semiotic Analysis”. En Handbook of Qualitative Research, editado por Norman Denzin e Yvonna Lincoln, 463-477. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Marotta, Vince. 2021. “Meeting Again: Reflections on Strange Encounters 20 Years on”. Journal of Intercultural Studies 42(1):1-7. doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2020.1864969
Mignolo, Walter. 1989. “Colonial situations, geographical discourses and territorial representations: Toward a diatopical understanding of colonial semiosis”. Dispositio 14(36/38): 93-140. https://bit.ly/3kw7jmB
Montt Strabucchi, Maria. 2017. “Mexico City’s ‘Chinos’ and ‘Barrio Chino’: Strangerness and Community in Cristina Rivera Garza’s ‘Verde Shanghai’ (2011)”. Verge: Studies in Global Asias 3(2): 144-168. doi.org/10.5749/vergstudglobasia.3.2.0144
Montt Strabucchi, Maria, y Carol Chan. 2020. “Questioning the Conditional Visibility of the Chinese: (Non)Normative Representations of China and Chineseness in Chilean Cultural Productions”. Journal of Chinese Overseas 16(1): 90-116. doi.org/10.1163/17932548-12341414
Montt Strabucchi, Maria, Carol Chan y María Elvira Ríos. 2022. Chineseness in Chile. Shifting Representations During the Twenty-First Century. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. bit.ly/3LzXPA7
Palinkas, Lawrence, Sarah M. Horwitz, Carla A. Green, Jennifer P. Wisdom, Naihua Duan y Kimberly Hoagwood. 2015. “Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research”. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 42: 533-544. doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Paltiel, Jeremy. 2018. “Facing China: Canada between fear and hope”. International Journal: Canada's Journal of Global Policy Analysis 73(3): 343-363. doi.org/10.1177/0020702018792908
Patton, Michael Quinn. 2001. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Madrid: Morata.
Pavli?evi?, Dragan. 2018. “‘China Threat’ and ‘China Opportunity’: Politics of Dreams and Fears in China-Central and Eastern European Relations”. Journal of Contemporary China 27(113): 688-702. doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1458057
Peñamarín, Cristina. 1997. “El análisis de los textos en una nueva clave. Discursos e imágenes sobre la inmigración en El País”. CIC: Cuadernos de información y comunicación 3: 145-188. https://bit.ly/3J12Kka
Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The concept of representation. California: Universidad de California Press.
Pye, Lucian. 1992. Chinese Negotiating Style: Commercial Approaches and Cultural Principles. Nueva York: Quorum Books.
Ray, Rebecca, y Kevin Gallagher. 2016. “China in Latin America: environment and development dimensions”. Revista Tempo do Mundo 2(2): 131-154.
Ruble, Racheal, y Yan Bing Zhang. 2013. “Stereotypes of Chinese international students held by Americans”. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 37(2): 202-211. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.12.004
Santiso, Javier. 2007. The Visible Hand of China in Latin America. París: OECD Publishing.
Serrano Moreno, Juan Enrique, Alejandra Pérez Ceballos y María Gabriela De Abreu Negrón. 2021. “Beyond copper: China and Chile relations”. Asian Education and Development Studies 10(3): 359-373. doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-08-2019-0132
Serrano Moreno, Juan Enrique, Diego Telias y Francisco Urdinez. 2021. “Deconstructing the Belt and Road Initiative in Latin America”. Asian Education and Development Studies 10(3): 337-347. doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-01-2020-0021
Shen, Longyan. (2021). Chinese investment in Chile. What's Next in China-Chile Relations? Chile-Pacific Foundation and The Inter-American Dialogue
Shifrinson, Joshua. 2018. “Should the United States Fear China’s Rise?”. The Washington Quarterly 41(4): 65-83. doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2018.1557491
Stahl, Günter, y Rosalie Tung. 2015. “Towards a more balanced treatment of culture in international business studies: The need for positive cross-cultural scholarship”. Journal of International Business Studies 46(4): 391-414. doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.68
Stake, Robert E. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Subsecretaría de Relaciones Económicas Internacionales. 2019. “Direcon expone sobre beneficios de la modernización del TLC Chile – China”. 15 de marzo de 2019. bit.ly/3EMOkuB
Symington, David, y Heather Spurling. 1990. “The ‘Draw a Scientist Test’: interpreting the data”. Research in Science & Technological Education 8(1): 75-77. doi.org/10.1080/0263514900080107
Tan, Aik-Ling, Jennifer Ann Jocz y Junqing Zhai. 2017. “Spiderman and science: How students’ perceptions of scientists are shaped by popular media”. Public Understanding of Science 26(5): 520-530. doi.org/10.1177/0963662515615086
Teerikangas, Satu, y Philippe Very. 2006. “The Culture–Performance Relationship in M&A: From Yes/No to How”. British Journal of Management 17(1): 31-48. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00477.x
Urdinez, Francisco. 2021. China’s Improvised Mask Diplomacy in Chile. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Vernal-Vilicic, Teresa, y Lorena Valderrama-Zenteno. 2020. “Representación de la labor científica en dos continentes. DAST comparativo entre niños/as chilenos/as y espanoles/as”. Chasqui. Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación 144: 263-282. doi.org/10.16921/chasqui.v0i144.3767
Wang, Ning. 2020. “(Re)Constructing Neo-Confucianism in a “Glocalized” Context”. En Challenges of Globalization and Prospects for an Inter-civilizational World Order, editado por Ino Rossi, 997-1012. Cham: Springer. bit.ly/3nsb5i4
Willis, Jerry, Muktha Jost y Rema Nilakanta. 2007. Foundations of Qualitative Research: Interpretive and Critical Approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Wise, Carol. 2020. Dragonomics. How Latin America is Maximizing (or Missing Out on) China’s International Development Strategy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Yan, Junchen, y Marius Meinhof. 2018. “The other Chinese: identity work and self-orientalization of Chinese host country nationals in multinational corporations”. Social Identities 24(5): 666-683. doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2017.1386355
Yazan, Bedrettin. 2015. “Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake”. The qualitative report 20(2): 134-152. doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2102
Yehiav, Guy. 2021. “Merger And Acquisition (M&A) Execution: It’s All About The People”. Forbes, 16 de diciembre. https://bit.ly/3EOJjBP
Yin, Robert. 1981. “The case study as a serious research strategy”. Knowledge 3(1): 97-114. doi.org/10.1177/107554708100300106
Yin, Robert. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods. California: Sage Publications.
Zingales, Luigi, Paola Sapienza y Luigi Guiso. 2008. “Cultural Biases in Economic Exchange?”, bit.ly/3HCPSJl
Zhigang, Zuo, y Yang Fan. 2021. “Cultural Characteristics of Host Countries and Risk of Failure in Cross-border M&A: An Empirical Study Based on the Overseas M&A of Chinese Enterprises”. Foreign Economics & Management 43(1): 58-72. doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20201111.202
Zhiyan, Wu, Janet Borgerson y Jonathan Schroeder. 2013. From Chinese Brand Culture to Global Brands. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan.