Searching for the Institutional Arrangements Towards a New Global Environmental Governance
Main Article Content
Abstract
Over recent decades the planet’s ecosystems have been subjected to severe damage, as a result of their unprecedented exploitation, despite the institutional arrangements generated since the recognition of these environmental problems by the international community. This article examines some theoretical approaches to global governance, looking for answers regarding the interactive processes, institutions and sociopolitical actors immersed in the building of a new world governance. By means of a qualitative methodology, this work analyses the main weaknesses of the current institutional frameworks and the international sectorial organizations on the matters of environment, climate change and sustainable development. It is concluded that a root cause of the problem is the absence of authentic global governance systems to tackle the socioecological crisis, as the actual institutional frameworks consist of a chaotic conglomerate of formal and informal instruments, which lack the effective social and institutional articulation mechanisms needed by the complex, dynamic and interactive nature of the contemporary environmental quandary. The architecture of the new governance systems could be supported upon the multilevel, transversal and transnational integration of the institutional frameworks, as a basis for the reconfiguration of actors, processes and structures of the global environmental governance in the twenty-first century.
Downloads
Article Details
Letras Verdes, Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Socioambientales, operates under Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Work 3.0 unported (CC BY-ND 3.0).
The authors who publish in Letras Verdes accept these terms:
You are free to share / copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, including commercial. Therefore, authors retain the copyright and cede to the journal the right of the first publication (CC by-ND 3.0), which allows third parties the redistribution, commercial or noncommercial, of what is published as long as the article circulates without changes.
The following conditions exist for the authors:
Recognition - you must recognize the authorship, provide a link to the license and indicate whether changes have been made. You can do this in any way reasonable, but not in a way that suggest that has the support of the licensor or receives it by the use he makes.
Without Derivative Work – If you remixed, transform or create a work from the original material, you cannot broadcast the modified material.
For more details, visit the page of Creative Commons (CC).
References
Acuerdo de París. 2015. “Acuerdo de París adoptado en la COP21 del Convenio Marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Cambio Climático”, https://bit.ly/3yXRJlW
Aguilar-Støen, Mariel, Fabiano Toni y Cecilie Hirsch. 2015. “Gobernanza forestal en América Latina. Estrategias para implementar REDD+”. En Gobernanza ambiental en América Latina, editado por Fabio de Castro, Barbara Hogenboom y Michiel Baud, 331-370. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
Biermann, Frank .2007. “Earth System Governance as a Crosscutting Theme of Global Change Research”. Global Environmental Change 17: 326–337.
Brenner, Ludger. 2010. “Gobernanza ambiental, actores sociales y conflictos en las Áreas Naturales Protegidas mexicanas”. Revista Mexicana de Sociología 72: 283-310.
Bull, Benedicte, y Mariel Aguilar-Støen. 2015. “Cambios en las elites, instituciones y gobernanza ambiental. ¿Hacia un nuevo paradigma?”. En Gobernanza ambiental en América Latina, editado por Fabio de Castro, Barbara Hogenboom y Michiel Baud, 171-200. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
Carlisle, Keith, y Rebecca L. Gruby. 2019. “Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons”. Policy Studies Journal 4: 926-952. https://bit.ly/2RjnDIE
CGG (Commission on Global Governance). 1995. “Our Global Neighborhood”, https://bit.ly/3fH8muy
Deese, Richard. 2019. Climate Change and the Future of Democracy. Cham: Springer. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98307-3
Dingwerth, Klaus, y Philipp Pattberg. 2006. “Global Governance as a Perspective on World Politics”. Global Governance 12: 185-203.
Etty, Thijs, Veerle Heyvaert, Cinnamon Carlarne, Dan Farber, Jolene Lin y Joanne Scott. 2012. “Transnational Dimensions of Climate Governance”. Transnational Environmental Law 2: 235-243. doi.org/10.1017/S2047102512000155
MEA (Evaluación de los Ecosistemas del Milenio). 2006. “Informe de síntesis”, https://bit.ly/3vPNtD1
Finkelstein, Lawrence S. 1995. “What is Global Governance?”. Global Governance 1: 367-372.
Fuentes, José Luis. 2011. “Gobernanza para la conservación de áreas naturales protegidas”. En Gobernanza Ambiental en Bolivia y Perú. Gobernanza en tres dimensiones: de los recursos naturales, la conservación en áreas protegidas y los pueblos indígenas, editado por Karen Andrade Mendoza, 85-115. Quito: FLACSO Ecuador. https://bit.ly/3yZiuGr
Hogenboom, Barbara, Michiel Baud, Fabio de Castro y Mariana Walter. 2014. “La gobernanza ambiental en América Latina. Mapeando miradas, dinámicas y experiencias”. Ecología Política: 14-17. https://bit.ly/3g09Qiq
Holsti, Kalevi, J. 2004. Taming the Sovereigns. Institutional Change in International Politics. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Jahncke Benavente, Javier, y Rocío Meza. 2010. Derecho a la participación y a la consulta previa en Latinoamérica. Análisis de experiencias de participación, consulta y consentimiento de las poblaciones afectadas por proyectos de industrias extractivas. Lima: RED MUQUI. https://bit.ly/3idcSCx
Lamb, Henry. 1996. “Our Global Neighborhood. A Summary Analysis”, https://bit.ly/2SW3o4k
López-Claros, Augusto, Arthur Lyon Dahl y Maja Groff. 2020. Global Governance and the Emergence of Global Institutions for the 21st Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, Elinor. 2010. “Polycentric Systems for Coping with collective action and Global Environmental Change”. Global Environmental Change 20: 550-557.
Ostrom, Vincent. 1972. “Policentricity”. Ponencia presentada en la Reunión Anual de la Asociación Americana de Ciencia Política, Washington, D.C., 5-9 de septiembre.
Petrosillo, Irena, Roberta Aretano y Giovanni Zurlin. 2015. “Socioecological Systems”. En Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences, editado por Elias Scott, 1-7. Ámsterdam: Elsevier.
Ramphal, Shridath. 1994. Global Governance in the Global Neighborhood. Santa Barbara: Fundación para la Paz en la Era Nuclear. https://bit.ly/3vPM6nR
Stoker, Gerry. 1998. “Governance as Theory: Five Propositions”. International Social Science Journal 1: 17-28. doi/abs/10.1111/issj.12189
IPCC (Grupo Intergubernamental de Expertos sobre el Cambio Climático). 2013. “Resumen para responsables de políticas”. En Cambio climático 2013. Bases físicas. Contribución del Grupo de trabajo I al Quinto Informe de Evaluación del Grupo Intergubernamental de Expertos sobre el Cambio Climático, editado por Thomas F. Stocker, Dahe Qin, Gian-Kasper Plattner, Melinda M. Tignor, Simon K. Allen, Judith Boschung, Alexander Nauels, Yu Xia, Vincent Bex y Pauline M. Midgley, 3-29. Nueva York : Cambridge University Press.
Valaskakis, Kimon. 2001. “Long-term Trends in Global Governance: From “Westphalia” to “Seattle”. En Governance in the 21st Century, editado por Donald Johnston, 45-66. París: Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico. https://bit.ly/3cdVvOj
Walter, Mariana, y Leire Urquidi. 2015. “Consultas comunitarias. Respuestas a la minería a gran escala en América Latina”. En Gobernanza ambiental en América Latina, editado por Fabio de Castro, Barbara Hogenboom y Michiel Baud, 331-370. Buenos Aires: CLACSO. https://bit.ly/2SW2vJ2
Weiss, Thomas G., y Annelies Z. Kamran. 2009. “Global governance as international organization”. En Palgrave Advances in Global Governance, editado por Jim Whitman, 66-86. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan.
Whitman, Jim. 2009. “Global governance as sector-specific management”. En Palgrave Advances in Global Governance, editado por Jim Whitman, 139-159. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan.