Socio-environmental issues, experts and crossroads in the Argentine countryside
Main Article Content
Abstract
From an analytical framework that combines contributions from the history and philosophy of science, this article analyses the role of experts and scientific-technological knowledge in the current agricultural model in Argentina, dominated by transgenic agriculture. We reflect on the role of hegemonic scientific practices in the material transformations of the rural space and in the discourses on its functioning, taking three situations that involve the State, the companies and the rural communities. Through various specialized secondary sources and primary sources (graphic press, institutional documents, interviews with scientists, technicians and rural residents), we study the connection between the ways in which this knowledge is produced, the voices that influence the conformation of the research agendas, and the deep socio-environmental problems that shape the Argentine rural area. Finally, we analyze the role of this knowledge and of the political-institutional frameworks that affect its commodification and that of nature. As a result, we expose the intervention of this knowledge in shaping the current agricultural model as what has been called “a hellish alternative”, given that it is conceived and built as a space inexorably destined to extract portions of a commercialized nature, with consequent social and environmental implications.
Downloads
Article Details
Letras Verdes, Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Socioambientales, operates under Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Work 3.0 unported (CC BY-ND 3.0).
The authors who publish in Letras Verdes accept these terms:
You are free to share / copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, including commercial. Therefore, authors retain the copyright and cede to the journal the right of the first publication (CC by-ND 3.0), which allows third parties the redistribution, commercial or noncommercial, of what is published as long as the article circulates without changes.
The following conditions exist for the authors:
Recognition - you must recognize the authorship, provide a link to the license and indicate whether changes have been made. You can do this in any way reasonable, but not in a way that suggest that has the support of the licensor or receives it by the use he makes.
Without Derivative Work – If you remixed, transform or create a work from the original material, you cannot broadcast the modified material.
For more details, visit the page of Creative Commons (CC).
References
Agamben, Giorgio. 2004. Estado de Excepción (homo sacer II, 1). Valencia: Pre-Textos.
Bartra, Armando. 2006. El capital en su laberinto. De la renta de la tierra a la renta de la vida. México D.F.: Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México.
Benbrook, Charles. 2001. Trouble Times amid Commercial Success for Roundup Ready Soybeans. Glyphosate Efficacy is Slipping and Unstable Transgene Expression Erodes Plant Defenses and Yields. Sandpoint: Northwest Science and Envirommental Policy Center.
Benbrook, Charles. 2003. Economic and Envirommental Impacts of First Generation Genetically Modified Crops. Lessons from the United States. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
Binimelis, Rosa, Walter Pengue e Iliana Monterroso. 2009. “Transgenic Treadmill. Responses to the Emergence and Spread of Glyphosate-Resistant Johnsongrass in Argentina”. Geoforum 40 (4): 632-633. https://bit.ly/2YM3k6M
Ceccon, Eliane. 2008. “La revolución verde tragedia en dos actos”. Ciencias 1 (91): 21-29.
Faccini, Delma. 2000. “Los cambios tecnológicos y las nuevas especies de malezas de soja”. Agromensajes 4 (5).
Fisher, Mark. 2019. Realismo capitalista: ¿No hay alternativa? Buenos Aires: Caja Negra.
Francese, Christian, y Guillermo Folguera. 2018. “Saberes simplificados, tecnociencia y omisión de riesgos. El caso de los organismos genéticamente modificados”. RUNA 2: 5-27. http://bit.ly/2YNh5Ci
Gárgano, Cecilia 2018. “Ciencia, Tecnología y Mercado: Investigaciones en Arroz en el INTA Argentino”. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 13 (1): 75-83.
Gárgano, Cecilia. 2020. “Estado y ciencia empresarial en la Argentina del agronegocio. Implicancias políticas del conocimiento ¿útil?, un estudio de caso”. Sociohistórica. Cuadernos del CIS 46. doi.org/10.24215/18521606e107
Giarraca, Norma, y Miguel Teubal. 2005. El campo argentino en la encrucijada. Estrategias y resistencias sociales, ecos en la ciudad. Buenos Aires: Alianza.
Gómez-Lende, Santiago. 2019. “Modelo extractivo en Argentina (1990-2016): ¿del extractivismo clásico neoliberal al neoextractivismo progresista? Tres estudios de caso”. Sociedad y Economía 36: 82-105. doi.org/10.25100/sye.v0i36.7458
Gorz, André. 1994. “Ecología política. Expertocracia y autolimitación”. Nueva Sociedad 134: 32-41. http://bit.ly/3cPi2BY
Harvey, David. 2005. “El “nuevo” imperialismo: acumulación por desposesión”.
Socialist register. https://bit.ly/3pQsgG6
Howard, Philip H. 2009. “Visualizing Consolidation in the Global Seed Industry: 1996–2008”. Sustainability 1 (4): 1266-1287.
Howard, Philip H. 2015. “Intellectual Property and Consolidation in the Seed Industry”. Crop Science 55 (6): 2489-2495.
Howard, Philip H. 2016. Concentration and Power in the Food System: Who Controls What We Eat? Londres: Bloomsbury Academic.
Jergentz, Steve, Hernán Diego Mugni, Carlos Alberto Bonetto y Ricardo Schulz. 2005. “Assessment of Insecticide Contamination in Runoff and Stream Water of Small Agricultural Streams in the Main Soybean Area of Argentina”. Chemosphere 61 (6): 817-826. http://bit.ly/3jfNwmcKloppenburg
Krimsky, Sheldon. 1991. “The profit of scientific discovery and its normative implications”. Chicago Kent Law Review 75 (3): 15-39. https://bit.ly/3pPc489
La Capital. 2016. “San José de la Esquina: detectaron alarmante concentración de un herbicida”. 9 de septiembre.
La Gaceta. 2013. “Munasqa nació en la EEAOC y cruzó fronteras”. 27 de diciembre. http://bit.ly/36Ltpai
La Nación. 2005. “Agricultura: con tecnología Clearfield. Primera variedad de arroz resistente a herbicidas”. 3 de septiembre. http://bit.ly/3pUqlAk
Lajmanovich, Rafael Carlos, Paola Peltzer, Andrés Maximiliano Attademo, Candela Martinuzzi, María Fernanda Simonillo, Carlina Colussi, Ana Paula Cuzziol Boccioni y Mirna Sigrist. 2019. “First Evaluation of Novel Potential Synergistic Effects of Glyphosate and Arsenic Mixture on Rhinella Arenarum (Anura: Bufonidae) Tadpoles”. Heliyon 5: e02601. doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02601
Lander, Edgardo. 2005. “La ciencia neoliberal”. Revista Venezolana de Economía y Ciencias Sociales 11 (2): 35-69. http://bit.ly/2YNwDpn
Lang, John. 2013. “Genetically Modified Foods. Recent Developments”. En The Oxford Encyclopedia of Food and Drink in America, compilado por A. F. Smith, 90-98. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Lapegna, Pablo. 2019. La Argentina transgénica. De la resistencia a la adaptación, una etnografía de las poblaciones campesinas. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
León Vega, Xavier Alejandro. 2014. “Transgénicos, agroindustria y soberanía alimentaria”. Letras Verdes. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Socioambientales 16: 29-53. doi.org/10.17141/letrasverdes.16.2014.1235
Levidow, Les, Joseph Murphy y Susan Carr. 2007. Recasting Substantial Equivalence. Transatlantic Governance of GM food”. Science, Technology and Values 32 (1): 26-64. http://bit.ly/3tnG8df
Marcuse, Herbert. 1954. El hombre unidimensional. Barcelona: Seix Barral.
Montrie, Chad. 2018. The Myth of Silent Spring. Rethinking the Origins of American Environmentalism. California: University of California Press.
Otero, Gerardo. 2012. “The Neoliberal Food Regime in Latin America. State, Agribusiness Transnational Corporations and Biotechnology”. Canadian Journal of Development Studies 33 (3): 282-294. https://bit.ly/3tD0wqS
Pechlaner, Gabriela. 2012. Corporate Crops. Biotechnology, Agriculture, and the Struggle for Control. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Pérez, Gonzalo, Ana María Torremorell, Hernán Mugni, Patricia Laura Rodríguez, María Solange Vera; Mauro Do Nasciemiento, Luz Allende, José Fernando Bustingorry, Franciso José Escaray, Marcela Andrea Ferraro, Irina Izaguirre, Haydee Norma Pizarro, Carlos Alberto Bonneto, Donald Morris y Horacio Ernesto Zagarese. “Effects of the Herbicide Roundup on Fresh Water Microbial Communities. A Mesocom Study”. Ecological Applications 17 (8): 2310-2322. doi.org/10.1890/07-0499.1
Pestre, Dominique. 2005. Ciencia, dinero y política. Un ensayo de interpretación. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.
Picado, Wilson. 2008. “Ciencia y geopolítica en los orígenes de la Revolución Verde”. Revista de Ciencias Ambientales 36 (2): 46-56. doi.org/10.15359/rca.36-2.6
Ross, Eric. 2003. “Malthusianism, Capitalist Agricultore, and the Fate of Peasants in the Making of the Modern World Food System”. Review of Radical Political Economics, 35 (4): 437-461. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0486613403257801
Stengers, Isabelle, y Philippe Pignard. 2017. La brujería capitalista. Buenos Aires: Hekht.
Stengers, Isabelle. 2017. En tiempos de catástrofes. Cómo resistir a la barbarie que viene. Buenos Aires: Futuro Anterior.
Teubal, Miguel, Diego Domínguez y Pablo Sabatino. 2005. “Transformaciones agrarias en Argentina. Agricultura industrial y sistema agroalimentario”. En El campo argentino en la encrucijada: estrategias y resistencias sociales, ecos en la ciudad, editado por Norma Giarracca y Miguel Teubal, 37-78. Buenos Aires: Alianza.
Teubal, Miguel. 2001. “Globalización y nueva ruralidad en América Latina”. En ¿Una nueva ruralidad en América Latina?, compilado por Norma Giarraca, 45-66. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
Trigo, Eduardo, y Eugenio Cap. 2003. “The Impact of the Introduction of Transgenic Crops in Argentinean Agriculture”. AgBioForum 6 (3): 87-94. https://bit.ly/3tp4IdA