Participatory Guarantee Systems in Ecuador. Approaches to its development

Main Article Content

Mauricio Pino Andrade

Abstract

 


This study examines Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) as an alternative to Third Party Certification (TPC). These schemes are characterized by its multi-stakeholder approach which relies on principles like participation, transparency and trust. This research, based on the logics of process-tracing and comparative analysis, analyzed the experiences with PGS of the peasant’s network Red Ecovida from Brazil, and Ecuador’s experience. This study supports the idea that TPC created a normative trajectory that resulted in this scheme embedding the regulations on organics. Consequently, other systems than TPC are excluded from official recognition. The idea of norm diffusion through localization is also backed up in the analysis (from Brazil to Ecuador). This especially due to that PGS are better suited to the social, economic and environmental conditions of small-scale farmers. In the Ecuadorian case, PGS are meant as congruence builders (among the legal, political and productive grounds of the country), rather than just mechanisms of control. The main aim of PGS is to scale up agroecology by enhancing production, markets and consumption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pino Andrade, Mauricio. 2017. “Participatory Guarantee Systems in Ecuador. Approaches to Its Development”. Letras Verdes. Revista Latinoamericana De Estudios Socioambientales, no. 22 (September):120-45. https://doi.org/10.17141/letrasverdes.22.2017.2679.
Section
Dossier
Author Biography

Mauricio Pino Andrade, Universidad de Cuenca

Licenciado en Estudios Internacionales por la Universidad del Azuay. Máster en Ciencia Política-Relaciones Internacionales por la Universidad de Ámsterdam. Docente de la Carrera de Sociología, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas de la Universidad de Cuenca.