Capitalist development, globalization, and the agrarian question in the 21st century
Main Article Content
Abstract
The issue of capitalist development in agriculture and its various forms has been central in the social sciences. Traditionally, the theoretical focus was on the ways in which capital penetrated agriculture and the roles played by the peasantry and large landowners. Since the mid-1970s, the deepening of capitalist development, globalization, and economic liberalization have profoundly transformed agricultural production on a global scale. This article is organized around two questions: How should we think about the agrarian question today? To what extent can it still be confined to the “peasant problem” and/or the question of the survival of small-scale production? The aim is to characterize the agricultural sector and the labor force employed in it in order to contribute to the conceptualization of the agrarian question in the 21st century. The hypothesis
is that the creation of a surplus population for capital (relative surplus population) offers a more fruitful path for rethinking the so-called agrarian question than the question of whether or not the peasantry persists. The research is quantitative in nature and uses secondary data mainly from international organizations such as the FAO and the ILO, to characterize both countries worldwide in terms of capitalist development and the workers employed in the agricultural sector.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Eutopía, Revista de Desarrollo Económico Territorial, operates under Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Work 3.0 unported (CC BY-ND 3.0).
The authors who publish in Eutopía accept these terms:
You are free to share / copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, including commercial. Therefore, authors retain the copyright and cede to the journal the right of the first publication (CC by-ND 3.0), which allows third parties the redistribution, commercial or noncommercial, of what is published as long as the article circulates without changes.
The following conditions exist for the authors:
Recognition - you must recognize the authorship, provide a link to the license and indicate whether changes have been made. You can do this in any way reasonable, but not in a way that suggest that has the support of the licensor or receives it by the use he makes.
Without Derivative Work – If you remixed, transform or create a work from the original material, you cannot broadcast the modified material.
For more details, visit the page of Creative Commons (CC).
References
Araghi, Farshad. 1995. “Global Depeasantization, 1945–1990”. The Sociological Quarterly 36 (2): 337-368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1995.tb00443.x
Araghi, Farshad. 2000. “The great global enclosure of our times: Peasants and the agrarian questions at the end of the twentieth century”. En Hungry for profit: The agribusiness threat to farmers, food, and the environment, editado por Fred Magdoff, John Foster y Federico Buttel, 145-160. Nueva York: Monthly Review Press.
Ayelazuno, Jasper. 2023. “Land and Ocean Grabs and the Relative Surplus Population in Ghana”. Focal. Revista de Antropología Global e Histórica 97: 22-35. https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2023.970103
Azcuy Ameghino, Eduardo. 2021. El capitalismo agrario pampeano: teoría, problemas y argumentos. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Imago Mundi.
Banco Mundial. 2025. “Datos abiertos del Banco Mundial”. https://data.worldbank.org/
Bernstein, Henry. 2006. “Is There an Agrarian Question in the 21st Century?”. Canadian Journal of Development Studies 27 (4): 449-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2006.9669166
— 2010. Class Dynamics of Agrarian Change. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing / Kumarian Press.
Boltvinik, Julio. 2019. “Pobreza y persistencia del campesinado. Ponencia básica”. En Pobreza y persistencia campesina en el siglo XXI. Teoría, debates, realidades y políticas, editado por Julio Boltvinik, 73-112. Ciudad de México: Siglo XXI Editores.
Brass, Tom. 1994. “Some Observations on Unfree Labour, Capitalist Restructuring, and Deproletarianization”. International Review of Social History 39 (2): 255-275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859000112593
Byres, Terence. 1986. “The Agrarian Question, Forms of Capitalist Agrarian Transition and the State: An Essay with Reference to Asia”. Social Scientist 14 (11/12): 3-67. https://doi.org/10.2307/3517162
Camarero, Luis, Hubert De Grammont y Germán Quaranta. 2020. “El cambio rural: una lectura desde la desagrarización y la desigualdad social”. Revista Austral de Ciencias Sociales 38: 191-211. https://doi.org/10.4206/rev.austral.cienc.soc.2020.n38-10
D’Alessio, Néstor. 1969. “Chaco: un caso de pequeña producción en crisis”. Revista Latinoamericana de Sociología 69 (2): 384-409.
Donaire, Ricardo, Germán Rosati y Pablo Mattera. 2021. “Pobreza y desarrollo capitalista en el mundo, 2005–2015”. Ponencia presentada en el XV Congreso Nacional de Estudios del Trabajo. Buenos Aires, del 1 al 3 de diciembre. https://aset.org.ar/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/4_DONAIRE_ponencia.pdf
Donaire, Ricardo y Rosati, Germán. 2023. Los que sobran (para el capital): Los trabajadores argentinos entre el activo y la reserva. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editor Universitario.
FAO (Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura). 2015. “Family Farming Knowledge Platform”. https://www.fao.org/family-farming/detail/en/c/385087/
Friedmann, Harriet. 1993. “The Political Economy of Food: A Global Crisis”. New Left Review 197 (1): 29-57.
Galdini, Franco. 2023. “Rise of the Surplus Population? Land Decollectivization, Class Stratification, and Labor Precarization in Uzbekistan!”. International Labor and Working-Class History 103: 147-161. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0147547923000121
Gómez, Sergio. 1988. “Nuevos escenarios y actores en el sector rural de América Latina”. Documento de Trabajo 374, FLACSO-Chile.
Gras, Carla, y Valeria Hernández. 2014. “Agricultura empresarial y globalización: Identidades, instituciones y pilares del modelo agribusiness argentino”. En La dieta neoliberal: globalización y biotecnología agrícola en las Américas, editado por Gerardo Otero, 209-234. Ciudad de México: Miguel Porrúa.
Hobsbawm, Eric. 1999. Historia del siglo XX. Barcelona: Crítica.
Kautsky, Karl. 1984. La cuestión agraria: análisis de las tendencias de la agricultura moderna y de la política agraria de la socialdemocracia. Ciudad de México: Siglo XXI Editores.
Kay, Cristóbal. 2020. “Procesos de concentración de la tierra y del capital y la precarización del trabajo rural en la era de la globalización neoliberal”. En Concentración económica y poder político en América Latina, editado por Carlos Pástor, Liisa North, Blanca Rubio y Alberto Acosta, 219-248. Buenos Aires: CLACSO. http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/se/20200319051943/Concentracion-economica.pdf
Lenin, Vladimir. 1981. El desarrollo del capitalismo en Rusia. Moscú: Editorial Progreso.
— 1983. “El programa agrario de la socialdemocracia rusa en la primera revolución rusa de
–1907”. En Obras completas vol. 16, 201-440. Moscú: Editorial Progreso.
— 1985. “Nuevos datos sobre las leyes de desarrollo del capitalismo en la agricultura”. En Obras completas vol. 27, 135-238. Moscú: Editorial Progreso.
Li, Tania Murray. 2010. “To Make Live or Let Die? Rural Dispossession and the Protection of Surplus Populations”. Antipode 41 (1): 66-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00717.x.
Marín, Juan Carlos. 1969. “Asalariados rurales en Chile”. Revista Latinoamericana de Sociología 69 (2): 317-343.
Marx, Karl. 2004. El capital. Tomo I, volumen 3. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.
McMichael, Philip. 2002. “The Global Restructuring of Agro-Food Systems”. Mondes en Développement 30: 45-53.
— 2015. Regímenes alimentarios y cuestiones agrarias. Zacatecas: Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas / Miguel Ángel Porrúa.
OIT (Organización Internacional del Trabajo). 2024. “World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2024”. https://www.ilo.org/publications/flagship-reports/world-employment-and-social-outlook-trends-2024
— 2025. “Indicadores y herramientas de datos”. https://ilostat.ilo.org/data/
Rosati, Germán, y Adriana Chazarreta. 2025. Los excedentes del campo. Superpoblación relativa y cuestión agraria en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: UNSAM Edita.
Scully, Ben, y Akua Britwum. 2019. “Labour Reserves and Surplus Populations: Northern Ghana and the Eastern Cape of South Africa”. Journal of Agrarian Change 19 (3): 407-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12309
Smith, Jennifer. 2014. “Deproletarianization in the Peri-Urban Interface: Transforming Labor Relations in Polokwane, South Africa”. Human Geography 7 (3): 44-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/194277861400700304
Tapella, Esteban. 2004. “Reformas estructurales en Argentina y su impacto sobre la pequeña agricultura. ¿Nuevas ruralidades, nuevas políticas?”. Estudios Sociológicos 22 (66): 669-700. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=59806606
Teubal, Miguel. 1984. “Internacionalización del capital y complejos agroindustriales: Impactos sobre la agricultura latinoamericana”. Investigación Económica 170: 129-159.
Yeni, Sithandiwe. 2024. “Land, Natural Resources and the Social Reproduction of South Africa’s ‘Relative Surplus Population’”. Journal of Agrarian Change 24 (3): e12584. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12584