Public policies, family farming, corporate agriculture, decentralization, rural territories.
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the northern highlands of Ecuador, the family strategy for access to food is manifested through a diversity of factors. Specifically in the provinces of Carchi and Imbabura, there are activities directly related to food supply to the domestic market. Peasant families achieve diversification in their food through the family strategy which consists of a set of factors that include the production for their own consumption and for merchandizing, but especially family and social networks (social capital). Family agriculture as a central provider of supply to the domestic market, in addition should feed the family that develops this type of agriculture.
Downloads
Article Details
Eutopía, Revista de Desarrollo Económico Territorial, operates under Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Work 3.0 unported (CC BY-ND 3.0).
The authors who publish in Eutopía accept these terms:
You are free to share / copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, including commercial. Therefore, authors retain the copyright and cede to the journal the right of the first publication (CC by-ND 3.0), which allows third parties the redistribution, commercial or noncommercial, of what is published as long as the article circulates without changes.
The following conditions exist for the authors:
Recognition - you must recognize the authorship, provide a link to the license and indicate whether changes have been made. You can do this in any way reasonable, but not in a way that suggest that has the support of the licensor or receives it by the use he makes.
Without Derivative Work – If you remixed, transform or create a work from the original material, you cannot broadcast the modified material.
For more details, visit the page of Creative Commons (CC).
References
Azevedo da Silva, C. (2009). La configuración de los circuitos "de proximidad" en el sistema alimentario: tendencias evolutivas. Documents d‘Analisis Geogràfica , 11-32.
Bartra, R. (1975). La teoría del valor y la economía campesina: invitación a la lectura de Chayanov.En:Comercio Exterior. México.
Bartra, A. y Paré. L. (1979). Polémica sobre las clases sociales en el campo mexicano. México: Editorial Macehual.
Coello, M. (1981). ¿Recampesinización en la descampesinización?Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 329-342.
Chayanov, A. A. (1974). La organización de la unidad económica campesina.Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.
Ferrer, G. (2004). Campesinistas y descampesinistas, el debate y su influencia en los programas de intervención. Revista de desarrollo rural y cooperativismo agrario, 217-228.
Fischler, C. (1995). El (h)omnívoro. El gusto, la cocina y el cuerpo.Barcelona: Editorial Anagrama.
Gracia, M. (2005). MANERAS DE COMER HOY Comprender la modernidad alimentaria desde y más allá de las normas. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 159-182.
Kay, C. (2005). Enfoques sobre el Desarrollo Rural en América Latina y Europa desde Mediados del Siglo Veinte. 337-429.
Long, N. (1996). Globalización y Localización: Nuevos Retos para la Investigación Rural. In S. Lara, & M. Chauvet, La Inserción de la Agricultura Mexicana en la Economìa Mundial, 1-19.
Meillassoux, C. (1977). mujeres, graneros y capitales. México, D.F.: siglo xxi editores, s.a. de c.v.
Santos, M. (1979). O espaço dividido. Os dois circuitos da economia urbana dos países subdesenvolvidos. Rio de Janeiro: Francisco Ales ed.
Van Der Ploeg, J. D. (1990). LABOR, MARKETS, AND AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION.Oxford: Westview Press.
---------- (2006). O modo de produção camponês. En Schneider (Org.), A diversidade da agricultura familiar (págs. 13-54). Porto Alegre: UFRGS.
Warman, A. (1988). Los campesinos en el umbral de un nuevo milenio. Revista Mexicana de
Sociología, pp. 3-12.